Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, highly actionable calculator skill: lean tables, executable commands, two full worked examples, explicit input-validation guards, a checklist, and honest LIMITATIONS. The only weakness is progressive disclosure — everything lives in one ~180-line file rather than splitting the per-score interpretation tables into a separate reference file.
Suggestions
Consider moving the per-score interpretation tables into a separate reference file (e.g. references/interpretation.md) and keeping SKILL.md as an overview with a clear one-level-deep pointer, to improve progressive disclosure and reduce base-context load.
Add an explicit re-run/retry note for when a tool call fails or returns an unexpected unit (e.g., on a unit mismatch, correct the input and re-run) to formalize the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense: compact scenario/inputs/interpretation tables and executable commands with no padding explaining basic clinical or programming concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable `tu run <tool> '{...}'` commands with concrete JSON payloads, exact tool names, exact required/optional fields, and two complete worked examples showing inputs and expected outputs — copy-paste ready covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence (Map → Gather → Compute → Interpret) with explicit validation checkpoints (ask rather than guess missing required values, state assumed-false booleans), a completeness checklist, and a LIMITATIONS feedback section; no destructive/batch cap applies to read-only computation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (steps, per-score subsections, worked examples, checklist, limitations) and appropriately self-contained, but it is a single monolithic file with no one-level-deep references to separate files for the dense per-score interpretation tables, leaving minor organization gaps versus the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |