CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring

Compute and interpret validated bedside clinical risk scores and pretest probabilities for an INDIVIDUAL patient — pick the right score for the scenario, gather inputs, run the deterministic calculator tool, and read the result against an interpretation table. Covers CHA2DS2-VASc (AF stroke risk), HAS-BLED (bleeding on anticoagulation), CURB-65 (pneumonia severity / admit decision), qSOFA (sepsis screen), Child-Pugh + MELD-Na (cirrhosis severity / transplant priority), Wells DVT and Wells PE (VTE pretest probability), ASCVD (10-year cardiovascular risk / statin decision), and eGFR CKD-EPI (kidney function / drug dosing). Use when asked things like "stroke risk for this AF patient", "should this patient be anticoagulated", "pneumonia severity — admit or not?", "sepsis screen this patient", "DVT/PE pretest probability", "10-year cardiovascular risk", "cirrhosis severity / MELD score", or "eGFR / kidney function". Pairs CHA2DS2-VASc with HAS-BLED to weigh anticoagulation. NOT for polygenic/genetic risk (use tooluniverse-polygenic-risk-score), NOT for population-level epidemiology/incidence (use tooluniverse-epidemiological-analysis), and NOT for diagnostic test sensitivity/specificity/likelihood-ratio math (use tooluniverse-diagnostic-test-evaluation).

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient clinical skill body with executable commands, explicit input-validation gating, paired-score weighing guidance, and a thorough LIMITATIONS section. It appropriately self-contains its content rather than relying on a bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean throughout: no padding explaining what a score 'is', assumes Claude's competence, and every table/worked example earns its tokens by carrying actionable thresholds rather than background.

3 / 3

Actionability

Fully executable `tu run <tool> '<json>'` commands with exact required/optional arguments, plus two copy-paste-ready worked examples showing input and expected output (score, interpretation, components).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear Step 1→4 sequence (map→gather→compute→interpret) backed by a completeness checklist, with an explicit 'ask rather than guess' input-verification gate and stated assumptions for optional booleans.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained skill with no references/scripts/assets bundle present and none referenced; well-organized into clear sections (mapping table, inputs table, per-score interpretation tables, worked examples, checklist, LIMITATIONS).

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with explicit what/when triggers and natural user phrasing across all 10 covered scores. The only blemish is the truncated 'NOT for...' tail, which does not materially weaken the trigger guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('pick the right score', 'gather inputs', 'run the deterministic calculator tool', 'read the result against an interpretation table') and enumerates all 10 named scores with their clinical purpose.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (compute/interpret validated bedside risk scores) and when (the 'Use when...' trigger clause with multiple natural examples).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasing via an explicit 'Use when asked things like' clause quoting real utterances ('stroke risk for this AF patient', 'pneumonia severity — admit or not?', 'eGFR / kidney function').

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear clinical-risk-scoring niche with distinct triggers and a 'NOT for...' carve-out; the CHA2DS2-VASc+HAS-BLED pairing cue further narrows triggering.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
mims-harvard/ToolUniverse
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.