Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestration guide with strong tool-level specificity and recovery paths, though it leans verbose in its conceptual framing and keeps most material inline rather than progressively disclosed.
Suggestions
Tighten or trim the Conservation Reasoning Framework to only the interpretation rules specific to this skill's data path, removing general dN/dS and ortholog-type exposition Claude already knows.
Move the per-tool parameter reference into a references/ file (e.g. TOOLS.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise workflow overview with one-level-deep links.
Consider extracting the dN/dS computation detail into a reference doc, leaving SKILL.md to point to scripts/dnds.py and the deeper guide.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tool guidance, but the Conservation Reasoning Framework reads like a textbook on dN/dS and ortholog types that partially restates domain knowledge Claude already has and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool names with required parameters (e.g. EnsemblCompara_get_orthologues with gene/species/target_species) and an executable Sequence_dn_ds(seq1="ATG...", seq2="ATG...") example, copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 1–6 sequence with a Fallback Strategies section providing error-recovery loops and a Synthesis Questions checklist for interpreting evidence, matching the explicit-checkpoint anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and the bundled scripts/dnds.py is a real, clearly signaled one-level reference, but the references/ directory is empty and nearly all detail (tool reference, reasoning framework) is inline rather than split into reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |