Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, fully actionable, and well-structured: it gives an executable command and named tools up front, walks through prepare→fit→interpret→quality-check steps with explicit validation gating, and offloads only advanced needs to a verified bundle script. No verbosity, no missing checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line delivers domain-specific, actionable guidance (assay gotchas, the 4PL formula, parameter sanity checks), matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste-ready command with real arguments ('tu run DoseResponse_calculate_ic50 ...'), named alternative tools (DoseResponse_fit_curve, DoseResponse_compare_potency) with their inputs/outputs, and a real script for advanced needs — covering the common cases, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Step 1–4 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (r² ≥ 0.95 gating, ≥4-point coverage requirement, bracketing the inflection) and feedback loops for error recovery ('if it's at/beyond an endpoint, the curve is incomplete... recommend wider concentrations'), matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to a real bundle file ('scripts/fit_dose_response.py runs a scipy 4PL fit from a CSV and matches the tool') plus a Related skills section, giving easy navigation, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |