Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A content-rich, well-organized skill body with strong executable examples and tool-specific param guidance. Its main weaknesses are repeated dose-feasibility prose, a pseudocode featured procedure, implicit validation checkpoints, and four dangling references to non-existent bundle files.
Suggestions
Create the referenced bundle files (PROCEDURES.md, REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) or remove the references, so the progressive-disclosure navigation does not dead-end.
Consolidate the dose-feasibility guidance into one location; it is currently repeated across Best Practices #4, the Computational Procedure, and the closing Key principle.
Complete the check_dose_feasibility code block with actual IC50/Ki parsing logic instead of ending in `pass`, since it is presented as a featured executable procedure.
Make workflow checkpoints explicit (e.g., 'Validate target association >0.5 before proceeding to Phase 2') rather than leaving them as implicit interpretive questions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and rich in high-value tool-specific knowledge (param gotchas like `query=` not `target_name=`, response nesting paths), but the dose-feasibility principle is restated at least three times (Best Practices #4, the Computational Procedure intro, and the closing 'Key principle') and could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick Start is fully executable with real tool calls and response paths, and the tool catalog gives concrete params, but the featured Computational Procedure ends in `pass # Parse actual values from results`, leaving the central helper as pseudocode — a minor but real gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-phase sequence is present with synthesis guidance, but checkpoints are implicit (interpretive questions) rather than explicit validate-then-proceed gates, and the detailed step-by-step procedures are deferred to PROCEDURES.md which does not exist. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear and references are explicitly signaled (dedicated Reference Files section, inline 'See: PROCEDURES.md'), but all four referenced files (PROCEDURES.md, REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) are absent and no bundle directory exists, so navigation dead-ends and bulk content (tool catalog, scoring tables) is inlined that belongs in separate files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |