Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured reference-model skill: compact tables drive model selection, an executable example and supporting script anchor the workflow, and gotchas/limitations are surfaced honestly. Worked examples for the non-Bliss models and an explicit input-validation checkpoint would lift it further.
Suggestions
Add one short worked `tu run` example for a second model (e.g. Loewe or ZIP) so each common case has copy-paste reference, not just Bliss.
Promote the scale-mismatch check into an explicit Step 1 validation checkpoint ("Confirm effects are fractional inhibition 0–1; if % viability, convert with inhibition = 1 − viability/100 before proceeding") rather than only listing it in gotchas.
State the ≥3 measurable dose-point requirement for Loewe/CI/ZIP as a pre-flight check in Step 0/Step 2 so a failed Hill fit is caught before invocation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout: compact decision tables map data→model→tool→inputs, and the one conceptual sentence ("Synergy only means something relative to a null model of additivity") is the load-bearing insight, not padding — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste executable Bliss command and a script with exact usage, and the Step-0 table lists concrete tool names plus exact input fields per scenario; held back from 5 because only Bliss gets a full worked example while the other models rely on parameter listings. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps (Step 0 pick model → Step 1 understand additivity → Step 2 run → Step 3 interpret → Step 4 gotchas) with scale-conversion and ceiling-effect caveats surfaced, but validation checkpoints are presented in the gotchas rather than as explicit inline checkpoints in the run flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned overview with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (scripts/synergy_reference.py, which exists) and a related-skills section; no nesting, easy to navigate, content appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |