CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tooluniverse-ecology-biodiversity

Ecology, biodiversity, and conservation biology research — species identification (GBIF, NCBI Taxonomy), invasive species impact, ecosystem dynamics, conservation status (IUCN), niche ecology. Use for biodiversity questions, species comparison, invasion biology, conservation prioritization, and ecology-related literature search.

63

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugin/skills/tooluniverse-ecology-biodiversity/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A generally actionable and well-structured reasoning skill with concrete tools and executable GBIF code, undermined by restatement of well-known ecological concepts and absent validation checkpoints in its workflows. Tightening the textbook sections and adding verify-then-report steps would raise the score.

Suggestions

Trim or remove the Community Ecology and Evolutionary Ecology concept glossary (trophic cascades, keystone species, mimicry, r/K selection) since Claude already knows these; keep only non-obvious decision guidance.

Add an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint to the COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE flow (e.g., 'run analysis, inspect output, re-query tools if results are missing or inconsistent, then report').

Either move the Available Tools table and GBIF navigation into a short reference file (progressive disclosure) or tighten the body under 50 lines so the simple-skill exception applies cleanly.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient, but the Community Ecology and Evolutionary Ecology sections restate textbook concepts Claude already knows (trophic cascades, keystone species, island biogeography, Gause's principle, aposematism, Batesian/Müllerian mimicry, r/K selection), which the guidelines explicitly penalize.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete tools table and copy-paste-ready, executable GBIF navigation code with real usage keys; however the code only covers the GBIF subtree while the broader skill actions remain framed as reasoning guidance rather than executable steps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Numbered reasoning frameworks (e.g., the 6-step invasive-impact assessment) give a usable sequence, but there are no explicit validation or feedback checkpoints despite guidance to execute and verify computed results.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers and no nested references, but at ~95 lines with no bundle files the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not fully apply, leaving minor organization gaps versus the ideal split-overview pattern.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description that concretely names capabilities and data sources, provides an explicit 'Use for' trigger clause, and carves out a distinct ecological-research niche. Its main limitation is noun-phrase framing of capabilities rather than crisp verb-actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific capabilities with named data sources ('species identification (GBIF, NCBI Taxonomy)', 'conservation status (IUCN)', 'invasive species impact'), but they are framed as domain topics in noun-phrase form rather than verb-driven actions, leaving minor gaps versus the comprehensive verb-action anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (the listed research capabilities and data sources) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use for ...' clause with multiple trigger phrases, matching the explicit what+when anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural terms a researcher would say ('biodiversity questions', 'species comparison', 'invasion biology', 'conservation prioritization', 'ecology-related literature search') with useful synonyms, though a few common phrasings are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear ecology/biodiversity/conservation niche with domain-specific triggers (GBIF, IUCN, invasion biology) and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
mims-harvard/ToolUniverse
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.