Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with executable code in every phase and a clear multi-phase workflow. The main gaps are mild over-explanation and the absence of explicit in-flow validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Reasoning Strategies for Evidence Evaluation' and 'LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS' sections to the non-obvious essentials; Claude already knows the genetic-evidence hierarchy at a general level.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Phase 1 (e.g. 'Confirm Ensembl ID / MONDO CURIE resolved before proceeding to Phase 2; if missing, retry MyGene_query_genes / MonarchV3_search') to lift workflow clarity.
Consider moving the long 'Reasoning Strategies' block into a references/ file linked from Phase 7 to keep SKILL.md a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with executable code throughout, but sections like the genetic-evidence-hierarchy explanation and 'LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS' add explanatory prose that could be trimmed; not a 5 because a few passages over-explain. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each phase provides concrete, copy-paste-ready Python with real tu.tools.* calls and parameters (e.g. DisGeNET_get_gda(source="CURATED", min_score=0.3)), matching the fully-executable score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-phase sequence with an ASCII flow diagram and a Troubleshooting section for error recovery, but there are no explicit in-flow validation checkpoints (e.g. 'verify IDs resolved before Phase 2'), so it sits below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single file with clear section headers and one-level-deep, clearly-signaled links to sibling skills; no bundle files exist so content is appropriately self-contained, but the reasoning-strategies block could conceivably be a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |