CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tooluniverse-gene-regulatory-networks

Gene regulatory network analysis — TF-target inference (JASPAR motifs, ChIP-seq), motif scanning, eQTL integration, perturbation evidence (knockout/overexpression). Use for 'which TF regulates gene X', 'which genes does TF Y target', regulatory pathway reconstruction. Distinguishes direct (binding) vs indirect (co-expression) regulatory evidence.

72

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable tool catalog with a clear phased workflow and useful guardrail sections. It is concise for its scope and well-organized, though it could benefit from explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in its analytical workflow.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the workflow (e.g., 'if a JASPAR search returns no matrices, retry with a synonym or broader collection') to strengthen error recovery.

Consider extracting the per-tool parameter reference tables into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a leaner overview that points to the full tool catalog.

Trim the opening paragraph's conceptual framing ('A TF binding near a gene doesn't prove regulation...') into a tighter one-liner, since Claude already understands evidence hierarchy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient for a ~15-tool catalog — it assumes Claude's domain competence and avoids generic padding, with only minor instances of explanation that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully actionable: concrete tool names, parameter tables, copy-paste JSON examples, and return schemas covering the common cases for every phase.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear phased sequence (Phase 0 input disambiguation through Phase 7 enrichment) with guardrails via 'LOOK UP DON'T GUESS' and Common Mistakes; lacks explicit validate→retry feedback loops, though the skill is analytical rather than destructive.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file structure with clear headers (When to Use, Workflow, Common Mistakes, Common Use Patterns, Evidence Grading) and easy navigation; no bundle files are needed for this self-contained tool catalog.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states capabilities and provides natural trigger phrases for when to use the skill. It distinguishes direct vs indirect regulatory evidence, reinforcing its distinct niche. Trigger-term synonym coverage could be slightly broader but is otherwise excellent.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'TF-target inference (JASPAR motifs, ChIP-seq), motif scanning, eQTL integration, perturbation evidence' — with comprehensive coverage of the domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (TF-target inference, motif scanning, eQTL integration, perturbation evidence) and when ('Use for ...') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases ('which TF regulates gene X', 'which genes does TF Y target', 'regulatory pathway reconstruction'), though synonym/variation coverage is good rather than exhaustive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche in gene regulatory network analysis with distinct, domain-specific triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
mims-harvard/ToolUniverse
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.