Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable tool catalog with a clear phased workflow and useful guardrail sections. It is concise for its scope and well-organized, though it could benefit from explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in its analytical workflow.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the workflow (e.g., 'if a JASPAR search returns no matrices, retry with a synonym or broader collection') to strengthen error recovery.
Consider extracting the per-tool parameter reference tables into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a leaner overview that points to the full tool catalog.
Trim the opening paragraph's conceptual framing ('A TF binding near a gene doesn't prove regulation...') into a tighter one-liner, since Claude already understands evidence hierarchy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient for a ~15-tool catalog — it assumes Claude's domain competence and avoids generic padding, with only minor instances of explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable: concrete tool names, parameter tables, copy-paste JSON examples, and return schemas covering the common cases for every phase. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear phased sequence (Phase 0 input disambiguation through Phase 7 enrichment) with guardrails via 'LOOK UP DON'T GUESS' and Common Mistakes; lacks explicit validate→retry feedback loops, though the skill is analytical rather than destructive. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear headers (When to Use, Workflow, Common Mistakes, Common Use Patterns, Evidence Grading) and easy navigation; no bundle files are needed for this self-contained tool catalog. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |