Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, domain-rich skill body with concrete code and parameter guidance. Its weak spots are redundant tool listings and a Reference Files section that points to files that are not bundled.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the tool listings: keep tools in the Workflow Steps and remove or shrink the repeated 'All Tools by Category' section.
Either create the referenced files (REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, PROCEDURES.md, QUICK_START.md) or remove the dangling references.
Add inline validation checkpoints to the workflow (e.g., 'if no GWAS hits, broaden the trait before proceeding') instead of relegating all error handling to the Troubleshooting table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Much of the body is genuinely novel domain knowledge (gotchas, decision trees), but tools are listed two to three times (Workflow Steps, All Tools by Category, Quick Start) and the Overview re-lists steps that are expanded below, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The Quick Start gives executable Python with real tool calls and inline gotcha comments, and the Parameter Gotchas table contrasts wrong vs correct usage — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps with inputs, processes, and tools give a clear sequence, but there are no integrated validation/feedback checkpoints; error handling lives only in a separate Troubleshooting table. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | In-file sections are well organized and a Reference Files list is signaled, but the five referenced files (REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md, etc.) do not exist and detailed content (interpretation, examples) remains inline rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |