Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, mostly actionable skill body with strong executable code and a useful pre-computed-results checkpoint. It loses points for restated guidance, Phases 1-3 delegated without inline checkpoints, and a References section that names files not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the 'relative proportion of A to B → percentage' guidance into a single canonical section and cross-reference it once instead of restating it in both the CRITICAL block and Answer Formatting.
Inline at least the key validation/test step for Phases 1-3 (e.g., a grouped_summary → Dunnett's → report sequence with an explicit sanity check) instead of fully deferring to references/statistical_analysis.md.
Reconcile the References list with the actual bundle: remove or create the missing colony_morphometry.py and statistical_comparison.py, and add inline links from the body to fluorescence_analysis.md and troubleshooting.md so every listed file is discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with executable code and no padding about what imaging/microscopy is, but the 'relative proportion → percentage' guidance is restated twice (the CRITICAL block near the top and again in Answer Formatting), so it is not maximally tight. Not level 3 because of that redundancy; not level 1 because it does not explain basic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code (e.g. `from scripts.segment_cells import count_cells_in_image; result = count_cells_in_image(...)` and concrete `glob`/pandas loading), plus specific formatting recipes like `int(round(val, -3))`. This matches the highest anchor rather than the pseudocode (level 2) or vague (level 1) tiers. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision tree and RULE ZERO pre-computed-results checkpoint give a clear sequence, but Phases 1-3 are only summarized as 'See references/statistical_analysis.md' rather than enumerated inline, leaving implicit checkpoints. Not level 3 (checkpoints not fully explicit) and not level 1 (sequence is present with at least one validation gate). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body inline references are well-signaled and one level deep, but the References section lists scripts that do not exist in ./scripts/ (colony_morphometry.py, statistical_comparison.py — only 3 of 5 listed scripts are present) and several docs (fluorescence_analysis.md, troubleshooting.md) are listed but never linked from the body. This is structure-with-imperfections rather than the clean, fully-navigable level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |