Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable, well-validated workflow document whose only material defect is bundle integrity: the carefully organized progressive-disclosure structure points at five detail files that do not exist alongside it. Secondary issues are mild redundancy across the overview/summary/checklist layers and thin specificity in Phases 4.5 and 6.
Suggestions
Ship the five referenced files (TOOLS_REFERENCE.md, phase_details.md, report_template.md, CHECKLIST.md, EXAMPLES.md) in the skill bundle, or inline their essential content and delete the dead links — as it stands, every reference in the References table is unresolvable.
Collapse the overlap between the Workflow Overview ASCII tree and the Phase Summaries (e.g., keep the tree as the map and strip duplicated phase descriptions down to operational deltas), and trim the KEY PRINCIPLES list of items like 'Speed is critical'.
Add concrete tool names and parameter guidance for the Phase 4.5 KEGG pathway analysis and Phase 6 report synthesis steps, matching the specificity level of Phases 1-4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with tool-specific facts Claude cannot know (parameter correction table, fallback chains, pLDDT thresholds) and assumes domain competence throughout. It falls short of 5 because the workflow tree, phase summaries, and completeness checklist restate the same phase structure three times, and lines like 'Speed is critical - Optimize for rapid actionable intelligence' add little. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: wrong-vs-correct parameter table, example values ('GCF_000005845.2', "'mpox/clade-IIb'", min_proportion 0.95), scoring weights (30/25/25/20), and explicit thresholds (pLDDT > 70). Not 5 because Phase 4.5 (KEGG) and Phase 6 give only high-level direction without tool-call specifics, and code examples are delegated entirely to external files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven phases are clearly sequenced with a declared OUTPUT per phase, plus explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 0 parameter corrections, the pLDDT > 70 docking gate, per-phase completeness checklists) and fallback chains for error recovery — matching the anchor-5 pattern of sequence, validation, and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The References table is clearly signaled and one level deep, but none of the five referenced files (TOOLS_REFERENCE.md, phase_details.md, report_template.md, CHECKLIST.md, EXAMPLES.md) exist in the bundle — there are no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories, and the files appear nowhere in the workspace. Judged against the actual bundle structure, the disclosure chain is broken: every link is dead, so detail-seeking navigation fails. Not 2 because SKILL.md itself is well-sectioned rather than a monolithic inline dump. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |