CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tooluniverse-kegg-disease-drug

KEGG-based disease-drug-variant network research. Connects diseases to causal genes, drugs to molecular targets, and variants to pathways using KEGG's editorially curated databases (KEGG Disease, Drug, Network, Variant, Pathway). Use for drug repurposing via shared pathways, mechanistic disease-gene-drug networks, and pathway-based target discovery. Distinguishes direct (binding) vs indirect (pathway co-membership) drug-target relationships.

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugin/skills/tooluniverse-kegg-disease-drug/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable content with concrete executable examples and a clear phased workflow. The chief weaknesses are repetition of the same caveats across multiple sections and inline placement of lengthy interpretation guidance that could be offloaded to a reference.

Suggestions

Consolidate the direct-vs-indirect and KEGG-coverage/ID-caveat points so each appears once (e.g., in Reasoning Strategy) and is referenced rather than restated in Interpretation Guidance and Synthesis Questions.

Move the detailed Reasoning Framework (Evidence Grading table, Interpretation Guidance, Synthesis Questions) into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview that links to it.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., confirm a disease_id returned results before proceeding to gene/drug phases) to make the sequence's checkpoints explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and domain-specific, but key points recur across sections — direct-vs-indirect relationships and the KEGG coverage/ID caveat each appear three times (Reasoning Strategy, Interpretation Guidance, Synthesis Questions), which could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready Python with real IDs (H00031, D09996), a complete tool inventory table with params and returns, and an end-to-end example workflow covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced five-phase workflow with a 'LOOK UP DON'T GUESS' guardrail; the operations are read-only lookups so the destructive/batch cap does not apply, but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with no nested references, but at ~186 lines the detailed interpretation guidance and synthesis questions are inlined content that could be split into a separate reference file.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that names concrete capabilities and an explicit use clause within a clearly distinct KEGG niche. The main weakness is trigger phrasing framed as scenarios rather than natural user utterances.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions (connects diseases to causal genes, drugs to molecular targets, variants to pathways) plus a distinguishing direct-vs-indirect capability, giving comprehensive coverage rather than minor gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' and provides an explicit 'Use for...' clause with concrete scenarios, but the 'when' frames use-cases rather than natural user-mention trigger phrasing, so it could be more explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a domain user would say ('KEGG disease', 'drug targets', 'disease genes', 'drug repurposing'), but coverage is specialized with limited synonym variation, so a few natural terms are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to KEGG's specific disease-drug-variant databases with distinct triggers, creating a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
mims-harvard/ToolUniverse
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.