Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable skill body that walks through method choice, Gibson and Golden Gate design with runnable commands, an explicit pre-order QC checkpoint, and gotchas — supported by a real QC script. It assumes Claude's competence while remaining fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — it assumes Claude already knows what Gibson/Golden Gate are and uses tight tables and bullets with no padding about basic molecular biology. It is not a 2 because every section earns its tokens rather than including unnecessary explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable `tu run` commands with full JSON arguments and named output fields, plus a real referenced QC script with documented usage. It is not a 2 because the guidance is fully executable rather than pseudocode or abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Step 0 method choice through Step 4 gotchas) with an explicit validation checkpoint at Step 3 ('QC before ordering', PASS/WARN) before the costly ordering step. It is not a 2 because an explicit feedback loop is present for this batch/risky operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a one-level-deep reference to a real bundle script (scripts/cloning_qc.py for QC details) and Related-skills links; for a sub-50-line body this satisfies the simple-skill allowance. It is not a 2 because navigation is clearly signaled and content is appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |