Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable skill body with precise tool-call guidance and a clear three-step workflow. The main gaps are implicit (rather than explicit) validation checkpoints and a few sentences that could be tightened for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the workflow (e.g., 'If GTEx returns no eQTL, fall back to positional mapping and flag as Low evidence') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Tighten the 'Core Reasoning Principles' section by merging the narrative paragraphs into terse heuristics, trimming the few sentences that restate the workflow.
If the tool-parameter reference grows further, consider moving the 'Key Parameter Gotchas' list into a reference file and linking it one level deep to improve progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient overall — exact tool signatures, gotchas, and evidence tiers with no basic-concept padding — but a few reasoning sentences restate what the workflow already implies and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete and executable: real tool calls with exact parameter names and values, a dedicated gotchas section, explicit evidence tiers, and a final ranking formula (Genetic Evidence x Druggability x Pathway Centrality). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step workflow is clearly sequenced with evidence-tier checkpoints in Step 1, but validation/feedback loops for tool failures or empty results are only implicit rather than stated as explicit checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single, well-organized SKILL.md with clear section headers (When to Use, Tool Selection Guide, Three-Step Workflow, Gotchas, Limitations) and no nested references; no bundle files exist, but the inlined structure is appropriately sectioned. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |