Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced operational reference with concrete tool signatures, gotchas, and fallback strategies. Its main weaknesses are minor cross-phase repetition and a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure into bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the per-tool reference (signatures, return shapes, parameter notes) into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as a workflow overview pointing to it, improving progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate tools described in multiple phases (e.g., PharmGKB_get_dosing_guidelines, OpenTargets_drug_pharmacogenomics_data) by defining each once and cross-referencing.
Trim the "Key Parameter Notes" section to only items not already stated inline, or remove it in favor of inline gotchas, to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Per-line content is dense and high-signal with no conceptual padding, but at ~270 lines it repeats a few tools across phases (e.g., PharmGKB_get_dosing_guidelines in Phase 2 and 5) and the "Key Parameter Notes" section restates gotchas already described inline. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives exact tool names, required parameters, return shapes, copy-paste-ready call examples (e.g., CPIC_get_recommendations(drug="codeine", limit=50)) and concrete example workflow chains. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Phase 0→6 sequence with an overview diagram, explicit gotchas, and fallback/error-recovery branches; this is a read/query skill so the absence of destructive-operation validation loops does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content is inline in a single ~270-line file; the large tool reference is well-sectioned but could be split into a separate reference file rather than living entirely in SKILL.md. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |