Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable skill body with concrete tool calls, a sequenced workflow, interpretive checkpoints, and a worked example; the only weaknesses are minor narrative padding in the worked example and a dense single-file layout.
Suggestions
Tighten the worked example: drop editorializing like "textbook replicated association" and "a good sanity check that the panel is working" to recover token budget without losing the demonstration.
Consider trimming the opening PheWAS-vs-GWAS definition, which restates a concept Claude already knows, or compressing it to a single clause.
If the interpretation table or worked example grows further, consider splitting them into a reference file referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to keep the overview lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with non-obvious domain specifics, but the opening PheWAS-vs-GWAS definition and editorializing in the worked example ("textbook replicated association", "a good sanity check that the panel is working") are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready tool calls with concrete parameters (e.g. UKBTOPMed_phewas_by_variant(rsid="rs7903146", max_pval=5e-8, limit=25), Genebass_gene_burden_phewas(gene="PCSK9", burden_set="pLoF")), a report template, and a fully worked example covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (decide variant/gene → query in parallel → align phenotypes → judge replication → report) with explicit interpretive checkpoints (check af/num_cases before concluding ancestry-specific, verify ref/alt on opposite beta signs, treat pval:0.0 as underflow) and a checklist-style interpretation table. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (biobank panel, workflow, interpretation, report, worked example, limitations) with easy navigation and content appropriately placed in one self-contained file; no external references are needed, though the dense single-file form is a minor organization consideration. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |