Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, dense retrieval skill: precise tool map, executable verified-live examples with real hit counts, query-grammar pitfalls, per-endpoint field interpretation, explicit scope routing to sibling skills, a real one-level reference file, and a thorough limitations section. It earns its length through non-obvious domain knowledge and clear structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No filler or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section adds non-obvious domain knowledge (the +AND+ pitfall, token-vs-phrase matching, MedDRA/VeDDRA spelling quirks, verified hit totals), and repeated surveillance caveats are deliberate safety reinforcement rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready tool invocations with real verified outputs (e.g. OpenFDA_search_device_adverse_events with meta.results.total = 16619) plus exact tool names, endpoints, and Lucene syntax. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit gates: a query-grammar preflight checklist (avoid special characters, do not use +AND+) and an out-of-scope stop-and-route checkpoint; this is read-only retrieval so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that signals exactly one one-level-deep reference ('See references/openfda_fields.md for the full per-endpoint field reference'), and that bundle file exists and holds the detailed per-endpoint field list. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |