Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, tool-centric skill body with concrete parameters, a clear phased workflow, and a validation/checklist backbone. The main gaps are generic exhortation sections that dilute conciseness, missing explicit retry feedback loops for failed designs, and reference files that are named but not bundled for verification.
Suggestions
Trim or fold the generic 'LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS' / 'COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE' sections into the workflow phases so every line teaches protein-design-specific behavior rather than general agent conduct.
Add an explicit feedback loop after Phase 4 validation (e.g. 'if pLDDT < 70 or backbone RMSD high, regenerate backbones or re-run ProteinMPNN with adjusted temperature') to close the batch-operation retry gap.
Signpost reference files inline at the relevant phase (e.g. 'Phase 2: see DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md for sampling parameters') and ensure the referenced .md files are actually bundled so links resolve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tool/parameter tables and checklists, but the generic 'LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS' and 'COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE' exhortation sections and the 7-item KEY PRINCIPLES list are padding that applies to many skills rather than protein-design-specific knowledge. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names, exact parameter names ('diffusion_steps', 'pdb_string', 'sequence'), a Common Parameter Mistakes table, and numeric thresholds (pLDDT >85, 40 RPM) give mostly executable guidance, though no copy-paste code blocks appear in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-phase sequence plus a validation phase and a completeness checklist provide most checkpoints, but explicit validate→fix→regenerate feedback loops are not stated for failed designs even though this is a batch operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Reference Files section lists one-level-deep companions (DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md, TOOLS_REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md, CHECKLIST.md, design_templates.md), but no bundle files are actually present in the review directory to verify the references resolve, and the links are a flat bottom-of-file list rather than inline per-section pointers. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |