Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured and actionable reference material for a read-only retrieval skill, with a clear phased workflow and concrete tool guidance. It is somewhat verbose — re-explaining domain concepts Claude knows and duplicating response-format notes — and could offload reference tables to bundle files.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the 'Domain Reasoning' and 'Interpretation Framework' sections, which re-explain proteomics concepts (isobaric labeling bias, DIA vs DDA, instrument resolution) Claude already knows; keep only task-specific decision guidance.
De-duplicate the response-format notes, which appear both in Phase 1 ('Response Format Notes') and again in the 'Tool Parameter Reference' section.
Move the 'Common Species Taxonomy IDs' table and the 'Tool Parameter Reference' into a references/ bundle file and link to it from the body to reduce the monolithic length and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but the 'Domain Reasoning' and 'Interpretation Framework' sections re-explain proteomics concepts (TMT/iTRAQ bias, DIA vs DDA, Orbitrap vs ion trap) Claude largely knows, and the response-format notes are duplicated between Phase 1 and the Tool Parameter Reference. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names, parameters, return shapes, and example calls like 'MassIVE_search_datasets(page_size=20, species="9606")' plus a report template give mostly executable guidance, with only minor gaps (no worked end-to-end example). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence with explicit Phase 0 decision logic and a Fallback Strategies table for error recovery; the skill is read-only so the destructive-operation cap does not apply, though explicit pre-call validation checkpoints are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single file is well-organized into phases and tables with clear section headers; the taxonomy table and tool-parameter reference could be split out, leaving only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |