Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable guide for rare-disease genomics with a clear phased workflow and validation checkpoints, but it is over-long for a single file, repeats some guidance, and gives no executable code despite a compute-first directive. Splitting reference material into bundle files and tightening general-genetics explanations would raise the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Move the per-tool API reference and example workflows into reference bundle files (e.g. references/tools.md, references/workflows.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links, improving progressive_disclosure and conciseness.
Provide at least one executable Python example for the "COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE" directive (e.g., a pandas/scipy snippet analyzing retrieved ClinVar or epidemiology data) so the compute guidance is actionable rather than aspirational.
Trim general-genetics explanations Claude already knows (inheritance-mode definitions, consequence hierarchy) and de-duplicate the parameter-gotcha guidance that currently appears both inline and in "Common Mistakes to Avoid."
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with valuable tool-specific knowledge (parameter gotchas, association types, classification hierarchies), but at ~280 lines it also explains general genetics Claude already knows (autosomal-dominant/X-linked definitions, LoF consequences) and repeats inline guidance across "Fallback Strategies" and "Common Mistakes." It is mostly efficient but could be tightened, so it sits at the mid anchor rather than the lean top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Tool-orchestration guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready (exact params, aliases, defaults, e.g. GenCC_search_gene(gene_symbol="FBN1")), but the "COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE" directive demands executed Python while providing no executable code, and the example workflows are call-pseudocode sequences rather than runnable scripts. This matches the "some concrete guidance but incomplete" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Phase 0–9 pipeline with an explicit Completeness Checklist and Evidence Grading tiers serving as validation checkpoints, plus "LOOK UP DON'T GUESS" verification guidance and ordering rules (phenotype -> disease -> gene -> variant), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized into phases, but the skill is a monolithic ~280-line inline file with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent), so content that could be split out (full tool API reference, example workflows, evidence-grading detail) lives inline with no one-level-deep references — matching the "some structure, content that should be separate is inline" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |