Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced research workflow with explicit checkpoints and error-recovery fallbacks. The main improvement opportunity is splitting the per-tool API reference detail into a reference file to reduce SKILL.md length.
Suggestions
Move the per-tool parameter reference (Phases 0–8 tool blocks) into a references/TOOLS.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a strategy-and-workflow overview that points to it.
Trim regulatory/definitional asides (e.g., the EU/US "Below 1 in 2,000" rare-disease threshold and prevalence-tier definitions) since Claude already knows them.
Add a short "Quick start" example near the top so the most common single-query case is answerable before the full phase-by-phase walkthrough.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely token-efficient — tool names, required parameters, association-type distinctions, and review-star thresholds each earn their place — with only minor explanatory padding (e.g., prevalence regulatory thresholds) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every tool is documented with required parameters, aliases, exact executable example calls (e.g., Orphanet_search_diseases(name="Marfan syndrome")), allele-frequency thresholds, and explicit parameter-name corrections covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–9 are explicitly sequenced with a numbered variant-prioritization checklist, validation checkpoints ("Check BEFORE ClinVar", "always check for subtypes"), fallback error-recovery loops, and a closing completeness checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized section structure with a top-level workflow overview and no nested references, but no bundle files exist and a fair amount of API-reference-style detail is inlined rather than split into a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |