Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured content with a clear multi-phase workflow and good progressive-disclosure signaling, but it lacks executable code despite instructing computation and the referenced reference files are missing from the bundle. Actionability and progressive disclosure are the weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Add at least one executable Python snippet per analysis phase to satisfy the 'COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIVE' principle and raise actionability.
Include the referenced files (phase-procedures.md, tool-reference.md, reference-data.md, report-template.md) in the bundle, or remove the references if the content is meant to be self-contained.
Make per-phase validation checkpoints explicit (e.g., 'after Phase 2, confirm FDR<0.05 before proceeding') to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly efficient, assuming domain competence without explaining basics, but the closing Summary section recapitulates earlier content and a few tables could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present via specific tool names and parameter tables, but despite a 'COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE' directive there are no executable code examples — only reference-style tables and phase descriptions. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-phase sequence (Phase 0–8) with a report-first principle and completeness checklist is present, but per-phase validation checkpoints are implied rather than made explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled one-level-deep ('See phase-procedures.md', 'See report-template.md'), but the referenced bundle files are absent from the package, so the disclosure structure is only partially realized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |