Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and concrete tool/parameter guidance, but it is held back by prose-heavy reasoning sections and by deferring executable code to bundle files (IMPLEMENTATION.md et al.) that do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Target Evaluation Reasoning Framework' into bulletted thresholds (e.g. pLI > 0.9, LOEUF < 0.35, OpenTargets > 0.7) instead of four prose paragraphs to reduce token cost.
Either include the referenced bundle files (IMPLEMENTATION.md, EVIDENCE_GRADING.md, REPORT_FORMAT.md, REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md) in the skill bundle or inline the minimal executable code per path so the skill is self-contained.
Add at least one small inline copy-paste example for a representative PATH so the body is actionable without the missing IMPLEMENTATION.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — tool lists, path headers, and parameter corrections earn their place — but the multi-paragraph 'Target Evaluation Reasoning Framework' is prose-heavy and could be tightened without losing its actionable thresholds. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present (named tools, parameter corrections like 'param is id not uniprot_id', explicit retry/fallback chains, one executable snippet), but the fully executable per-path code is deferred to IMPLEMENTATION.md rather than provided inline, so guidance is incomplete within the body. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9 research paths are explicitly sequenced (identifier resolution first, PATH 0 'ALWAYS FIRST'), with a 'Completeness Audit (REQUIRED before finalizing)' checkpoint, report-first placeholders, and retry/fallback loops providing clear validation feedback. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Reference Files table cleanly signals one-level-deep references (IMPLEMENTATION.md, EVIDENCE_GRADING.md, REPORT_FORMAT.md, REFERENCE.md, EXAMPLES.md), but none of these bundle files are actually present in the skill directory, so the deferred detail is not available — structure is good in intent but the disclosure is incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |