Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, actionable pre-development workflow with concrete discovery commands and a clear sequence. It would benefit from a verification checkpoint and trimming minor filler.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step (e.g., 'Confirm you have read every file in the Pre-Development Checklist before proceeding') to serve as a hard gate.
Replace the abstract step 4 with a concrete command or glob example for reading the listed guideline files.
Drop the redundant closing 'mandatory' line and step 6 filler; the numbered workflow already implies proceeding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with executable commands and no concept over-explanation, but step 6 ('Understand the coding standards... then proceed') and the closing 'mandatory' line could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (get_context.py, cat index.md) for discovery, though step 4 ('Read the specific guideline files') stays abstract without a command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly numbered steps form a coherent pre-development sequence with a 'mandatory before writing any code' gate, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints beyond that gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Short, self-contained body (~30 lines) organized into numbered steps with no bundle files needed; lacks section headers, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |