Conciseness

The body is useful but repetitive — 'one question per message', 'action before asking', and 'research-first' are restated across the CoreRule, Core Principles, Step 3 Gate, Step 4, and Anti-Patterns, so it could be tightened; it does not explain concepts Claude doesn't know, so it is not a 1.

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (e.g. 'python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py create ...') and complete copy-paste-ready markdown templates for the PRD, research, expansion, and final confirmation, matching the fully-executable anchor.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 0–8 are clearly sequenced with explicit gates (Gate A/B/C, complexity table) and an explicit final-confirmation checkpoint; the convergence/approval loop serves as the validation checkpoint for this interview-style workflow.

Progressive Disclosure

The body references external files that are not present in any bundle — 'workflow.md' (Phase 1.2) and '.trellis/scripts/task.py' — and large PRD/research templates are inlined rather than split into referenced files, so structure exists but references are unresolved and organization could be improved.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Creates task directory, seeds PRD, asks high-value questions one at a time, researches technical choices, and converges on MVP scope' — which matches the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (the enumerated actions) and when via an explicit 'Use when ...' clause, matching the anchor that requires explicit triggers for both.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases such as 'requirements are unclear', 'multiple valid approaches', and 'user describes a new feature or complex task', giving good coverage of terms a user would naturally say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The collaborative requirements-discovery / brainstorm-before-implementation niche is distinct from execution skills, and its triggers are specific enough to avoid firing for unrelated skills.