Conciseness

Lean checklists and concrete commands with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its tokens, matching the lean/efficient anchor rather than the score-2 "could be tightened" level.

Actionability

Provides executable commands throughout (git diff, python3 get_context.py, cat, grep -r) and concrete checkboxes; only Step 3 is intentionally project-generic, so it meets the copy-paste-ready bar rather than the pseudocode score-2 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

Clear 6-step sequence with a fix-before-proceeding checkpoint in Step 3 and an explicit re-run-after-fix feedback loop in Step 6, plus conditional gating in Step 5; this matches the explicit-validation/checklist anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly signaled sections; the only pointers (`.trellis/spec/.../index.md`) are one level deep and explicitly framed as pointers, satisfying the well-organized single-file anchor.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks" — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor; not the vague score-2 level which names only some actions.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (the verification list) and when (explicit "Use when..." clause), matching the top anchor; the score-2 anchor lacks an explicit when trigger.

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions" clause supplies natural phrasings a user would say; better than the score-2 "some keywords" anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The lead phrase "Comprehensive quality verification" is broad and could overlap with general code-review/QA skills, even though the spec-compliance and cross-layer framing adds some niche; not clearly as distinctive as the score-3 anchor.