Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, dense, and highly actionable, with concrete commands, paths, and config keys throughout and an excellent one-level-deep reference structure. Its one weak spot is workflow_clarity: the customization workflow has good guardrails but no explicit validation/re-run feedback loop for destructive edits.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint to the 'How To Use' workflow, e.g. after editing run `trellis --help` / inspect `.trellis/config.yaml` to confirm a knob exists, and re-check `.trellis/.template-hashes.json` before any overwrite.
Make the destructive-edit guardrail in 'Do Not' (check `.trellis/.template-hashes.json` first, prefer `.new` sidecars) a numbered step in the workflow rather than only a negative rule, so the validation loop is part of the sequence.
Cross-reference the bundled `trellis-session-insight` skill from the `mem`/workspace-memory guidance so the 'when to reach for mem' validation path is reachable from the main workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a hook, task, or channel is, and packs concrete paths, config keys, and CLI subcommands into every line, matching the lean score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: concrete commands ('task.py create --parent <slug>', 'trellis channel spawn --agent <name>', 'trellis mem search|extract|context', 'trellis workflow --template <id>'), exact file paths, and named config keys ('channel.worker_guard.idle_timeout', 'codex.dispatch_mode') cover the common customization cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How To Use' section is a clear 5-step numbered sequence with an authority checkpoint ('read the actual files in the user project and treat local content as authoritative') and a 'Do Not' guardrail list, but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the destructive/batch local edits this skill governs, which the rubric caps at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview body points to well-labeled one-level-deep references grouped under Local Architecture, Platform Files, and Local Customization; every referenced path was verified to exist as a real bundle file, so navigation is clean and easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |