miro-code-review

Knowledge and patterns for effective code review visualization

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i github:miroapp/miro-ai --skill miro-code-review

What are skills?

1.38x

Quality

22%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

97%

1.38x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/miro-code-review/SKILL.md

SKILL.md

Review

Evals

Evaluation results

100%

15%

Pull Request Risk Assessment

Risk assessment classification and review depth

Criteria

Without context

With context

Auth file as High Risk

87%

100%

Middleware file as High Risk

16%

100%

SQL migration as High Risk

62%

100%

API controller as High Risk

66%

100%

Service file as Medium Risk

100%

Model file as Medium Risk

100%

package.json as Medium Risk

60%

100%

Test/type/doc files as Low Risk

100%

Composite risk formula applied

75%

100%

Critical escalation for JWT

100%

Mitigation: prior security review applied

100%

Mitigation: feature flag applied

100%

Security team review recommended

100%

Senior engineer review recommended

100%

Low-risk quick review recommended

100%

Without context: $0.1349 · 2m 8s · 8 turns · 13 in / 2,566 out tokens

With context: $0.2933 · 2m 44s · 12 turns · 14 in / 4,707 out tokens

93%

10%

Backend Code Review

Security anti-patterns and code quality issue detection

Criteria

Without context

With context

SQL injection flagged

100%

Hardcoded credential flagged

100%

Sensitive data in logs flagged

100%

Command injection flagged

100%

Timing-safe comparison flagged

37%

100%

Swallowed exceptions flagged

100%

Stack trace exposure flagged

100%

N+1 / inefficient query flagged

100%

Tight coupling / direct DB flagged

Boolean parameter anti-pattern flagged

28%

100%

Deep nesting flagged

100%

Sensitive data returned in response

100%

Without context: $0.3252 · 4m 12s · 12 turns · 18 in / 6,691 out tokens

With context: $0.3547 · 3m 17s · 12 turns · 1,483 in / 6,427 out tokens

100%

56%

Visual Code Review Board Design

Miro artifact type selection and board layout

Criteria

Without context

With context

Table artifact selected

62%

100%

Document artifact selected

100%

ER Diagram selected for schema

100%

Sequence Diagram for API

66%

100%

Class Diagram for refactoring

100%

Summary Doc at x=-2000

100%

Table at x=0

100%

Diagram at x=2000 or x=4000

100%

y=0 and y=1500 rows used

25%

100%

Correctness dimension covered

100%

Security dimension covered

100%

Maintainability/Performance covered

100%

Async/context benefit noted

100%

Without context: $0.2898 · 4m 17s · 15 turns · 22 in / 4,926 out tokens

With context: $0.2942 · 3m 10s · 14 turns · 16 in / 4,844 out tokens

Evaluated: 5 days ago
Agent: Claude Code
Model: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Pull Request Risk Assessment Backend Code Review Visual Code Review Board Design

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.