Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A deliberately minimal, well-structured MCP-delegating skill that is token-efficient and clearly scoped. Its main gap is actionability: it tells Claude to pick and call a tool without naming any specific MCP tool or providing an example invocation.
Suggestions
Name one or two concrete Miro MCP diagramming tools and show a minimal example call (with a board URL and a couple of parameters) so Claude has a copy-paste-ready starting point.
Add a brief output-validation step to the workflow (e.g., confirm the returned widget ID/URL exists on the board) to close the workflow_clarity validation gap.
Optionally list the most common diagram types supported so Claude can map a user request to the right tool without first inspecting every MCP tool description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely lean body that assumes Claude's competence and delegates detail to the MCP server ("The MCP server is the source of truth..."), with every token earning its place per anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a clear procedure (identify board URL, identify what to diagram, pick and call a tool) but defers all concrete execution to MCP schemas without naming specific tools or showing an example call, fitting anchor 3's incomplete-concrete-guidance criteria. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence with input-gathering checkpoints ("If missing, ask"; "Ask if unclear"), but no post-execution validation, matching anchor 4's clear-sequence-with-minor-validation-gaps description. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Workflow, When not to use) and no need for external references since detail lives in the MCP server, satisfying the under-50-lines simple-skill criterion for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |