Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill that appropriately treats the MCP server as the source of truth rather than restating tool details. It could be slightly more actionable by naming the likely document tool and adding a light post-call verification step.
Suggestions
Drop or merge the redundant opener ('Shortcut to the Miro MCP document tools.') into the following paragraph to remove the only padding in the body.
Name the specific Miro MCP document tool(s) most commonly used, so Claude has a default to reach for before exploring.
Add a brief post-call verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., confirm the widget was created on the correct board and handle tool errors) to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining Miro or markdown, but the opening tagline ('Shortcut to the Miro MCP document tools.') lightly duplicates the next sentence, a minor trim opportunity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete, executable procedure and correctly delegates specifics to the MCP tool descriptions as source of truth; the gap is that it never names which specific document tool to reach for, only how to discover it. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps are clearly sequenced with clarification checkpoints ('If missing, ask', 'Ask if unclear'), but there is no post-call verification or error-feedback loop; the operation is a single non-destructive tool call so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references (details live in the MCP server), and organized into clear sections (Workflow, When not to use), which the rubric's simple-skill note scores at 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |