Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured MCP-delegating skill that is concise and clearly organized. Its main weakness is actionability: it tells Claude to follow MCP tool schemas but gives no concrete example invocation or parameter pattern to ground the first call.
Suggestions
Add one short example MCP tool invocation (tool name + a minimal parameter sketch, e.g. board URL + content) so Claude has a concrete anchor before discovering the rest from the server.
Include a final workflow step that verifies the document widget was created on the board (e.g. re-fetch or confirm via the MCP server) to close the validation gap.
Name the one or two most likely document tools inline as a quick pick hint, while still pointing to the MCP server as the source of truth.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding: it never explains what Miro or markdown is and every line ('Shortcut to the Miro MCP document tools', the source-of-truth note, the three workflow steps) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is procedurally concrete ('Identify the board URL', 'Pick the appropriate document tool... and call it according to its description and parameter schema') but defers all executable specifics to the MCP server, with no example tool name, invocation, or parameter pattern to anchor on. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence with input checkpoints ('If missing, ask', 'Ask if unclear'), but there is no validation that the document was actually created/placed correctly on the board, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references (it delegates detail to the MCP server) and three well-organized sections (overview, Workflow, When not to use), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |