Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token-efficient, action-oriented principle listing with no padding and no over-explanation of known concepts. It is held just below top marks on actionability, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure for lack of a concrete before/after snippet and minimal sectioning, both of which are minor for a skill this short.
Suggestions
Add one short before/after SKILL.md snippet pair to make the 'no code-shaped parameter names' rule copy-paste concrete.
Split the principles under two labeled subsections (e.g., 'What to avoid' and 'What to do instead') to strengthen navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean four-bullet list of directives with only a brief, value-adding rationale per bullet; it assumes Claude's competence, explains no concepts Claude already knows, and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific ('fetch parameter definitions and tool descriptions from the MCP server directly at call time', describe values in prose like 'the board item ID' rather than `item_id`), with a worked contrast example; it stops short of a 5 only because no good-vs-bad SKILL.md snippet is shown to anchor the rules. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple, single-purpose skill with no multi-step or destructive process, the clean bulleted list is clear and well-organized; it is not a 5 because the content is a set of principles rather than an explicitly sequenced workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no external references needed, the single heading and organized bullet list meet the bar for a simple skill; it is not a 5 because there is only one flat section rather than clearly delineated subsections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |