CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cyber-audit

Read-only exposure audit of the user's MacBook (and ~/Documents/code projects) for a CVE, breach, malicious package, or other security advisory, then write a structured report to ~/Documents/security-reports/. Use when the user shares a breach/CVE/malware/supply-chain advisory and asks if they're affected, says "scan my system for X", "are we affected by Y", "check if I'm vulnerable to Z", or requests any hack/breach/cyber/vulnerability audit on this MacBook. Output matches the existing audit format in ~/Documents/security-reports/.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

cyber-audit

Hard rules

  • Read-only. No installs, removes, upgrades, restarts, network calls, or file modifications outside ~/Documents/security-reports/.
  • No sudo. Never.
  • One report per invocation. Always end by writing the .md file (even if the verdict is "Not affected" — the audit trail matters).
  • If a check requires a state-changing command, skip it and note "not checked (would require state change)" in the table. Do not run it.

Workflow

  1. Identify scope. Extract from the advisory: package/binary name, affected versions, platform (macOS / Linux / Windows), attack vector (supply chain / RCE / local / network).
  2. Run checks in parallel (Bash tool, multiple calls in one message). Pick relevant checks for the advisory type — don't run all of them.
  3. Build the table as you go. Each row = one check + concrete result (version number, path, "None", "N/A").
  4. Write the report to ~/Documents/security-reports/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-kebab-slug>.md. Use today's date from the environment header.
  5. Tell the user the verdict in one line + path to the report.

Check menu (pick what's relevant)

# --- Node / npm ecosystem (supply-chain advisories) ---
which npm pnpm yarn; npm root -g; pnpm root -g 2>/dev/null
ls /opt/homebrew/lib/node_modules                                  # global npm
find ~ -maxdepth 8 -type d -name "<pkg>" 2>/dev/null \
  | grep -v -E "(Library/Caches|\.Trash)"                          # installed copies
find ~/Documents ~/Desktop ~/Downloads -maxdepth 8 -type f \
  \( -name "package.json" -o -name "package-lock.json" \
     -o -name "pnpm-lock.yaml" -o -name "yarn.lock" \) 2>/dev/null \
  | xargs grep -l "<pkg>" 2>/dev/null                              # direct + transitive

# --- Python ecosystem ---
which python3 pip pipx uv
pip list 2>/dev/null | grep -i "<pkg>"
find ~/Documents -maxdepth 6 -name "requirements*.txt" -o -name "pyproject.toml" \
  -o -name "poetry.lock" -o -name "uv.lock" 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l "<pkg>" 2>/dev/null

# --- Homebrew / system binaries ---
brew list --versions <formula> 2>/dev/null
which <binary>; <binary> --version 2>/dev/null

# --- Running processes / listeners (for RCE / network CVEs) ---
pgrep -lf "<binary>"
lsof -iTCP -sTCP:LISTEN -P -n 2>/dev/null | grep "<port>"

# --- LaunchAgents / LaunchDaemons (persistence / autostart) ---
ls ~/Library/LaunchAgents /Library/LaunchAgents /Library/LaunchDaemons 2>/dev/null \
  | grep -i "<vendor>"

# --- Env vars that change exposure (e.g. OLLAMA_HOST, listening addr) ---
launchctl getenv <VAR>; grep -r "<VAR>" ~/.zshrc ~/.zprofile ~/.config 2>/dev/null

# --- VS Code / browser extensions (for IDE-targeted advisories) ---
ls ~/.vscode/extensions 2>/dev/null | grep -i "<ext>"

If the advisory mentions an ecosystem not above (Rust cargo, Go modules, Ruby gems, Docker images, etc.), apply the same pattern: global install path + manifest grep + running processes.

Report template

File: ~/Documents/security-reports/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-kebab-slug>.md

# <Subject> — Audit

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Host:** <machine name/model>

## <CVEs | Advisory> in scope

- **<ID or source> "<Name>"** — <one-line description>. <Affected versions or scope>.

## Audit results

| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| <Check 1> | <Result> |
| <Check 2> | <Result> |

## Verdict

**<Not affected. | Affected. | Partially affected.>**

- <Rationale bullet 1>
- <Rationale bullet 2>

## Action taken

None — diagnostic only, no files modified, no <packages installed/removed | services started/stopped | firewall rules changed>.

## Follow-ups

- <Actionable item, or "None" if truly nothing>

Match the tone of any existing reports in ~/Documents/security-reports/ — terse, factual, bulleted, no hedging.

Verdict wording

  • Not affected. — package/binary absent, or installed but patched, or not running and not exposed.
  • Affected. — vulnerable version present and reachable by the attack vector.
  • Partially affected. — present but mitigated (e.g. binary installed but service not running, or listener bound to loopback only). Spell out the mitigation in the bullets.

When to break the read-only rule

Never on your own. If the verdict is "Affected", list the remediation command in Follow-ups and stop. The user runs it.

Reference

If existing reports are present in ~/Documents/security-reports/, match their established style and format rather than introducing a new one.

Repository
mishatojk/davidskills
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.