Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly sequenced content with strong validation and error-recovery guidance. Its weaknesses are minor redundancy and a monolithic single-file structure that, at this length, would benefit from splitting reference material into linked files.
Suggestions
Remove the redundancy between the closing 'Mental model' section and the 'What `/goal` is' section — both state the 'contract enforcer with a verification loop' framing and the /plan distinction, so collapse them into one.
Move the inline reference material (troubleshooting table, control-command table, and the example goal blocks) into a reference file such as GOAL_EXAMPLES.md and link to it from SKILL.md, giving the 155-line skill proper progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but it restates the 'contract enforcer with a verification loop' framing in both 'What `/goal` is' and the closing 'Mental model', and repeats the /plan distinction, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready contract template, exact validation commands (`pytest -q`), concrete slash commands (`/goal pause`, `/goal resume`), and two fully worked example blocks plus command and troubleshooting tables. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Launch is a clear numbered sequence; the contract mandates a validation command after each change and a verifiable stop condition, and the 'When a goal drifts' section gives an explicit error-recovery decision flow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle/reference files exist and the 155-line body keeps everything inline (troubleshooting table, control-command reference, and multiple examples) with no one-level-deep reference links, though it is well-organized into clear sections. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |