Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body that gives concrete templates and examples while staying concise. The only gap is an explicit verification checkpoint in the workflow, though the operation is not destructive enough to trigger the hard cap.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after registration, e.g., 'Confirm the new row renders correctly in the Architecture Decisions table and the docs/adr/ file path resolves.'
Optionally include a one-line check that the chosen ADR number does not collide with an existing file before writing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (When To Create, Steps, Common Mistakes) earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready artifacts: a concrete ADR markdown template, the `ls docs/adr/` numbering command, an AGENTS.md table-row format, and good/bad trigger examples covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-step process with an emphasis on the registration step, but it lacks an explicit verify/feedback checkpoint (e.g., confirming the AGENTS.md row is correctly placed) before declaring the task done. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with no bundle files and no nested references; content is organized into well-signaled sections (When To Create, Steps, Common Mistakes) that are easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |