Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, directive skill body: every rule is project-specific, the templates and commands are copy-paste ready, and the workflow is clearly sequenced. The only improvements are de-duplicating the Common Mistakes table against inline rules and adding an explicit verification step before finishing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and entirely project-specific with no concept-teaching, but the Common Mistakes table partially restates rules already given inline ("Do not add a status field" vs. the "Adding status fields" row; AGENTS.md registration emphasized twice). Minor trimming is possible, placing it just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a concrete `ls docs/adr/` command, a complete copy-paste ADR markdown template, an AGENTS.md table-row format, and good/bad trigger examples. For an instruction-only skill this covers the common cases completely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps (confirm scope, determine number, write, register) are clearly sequenced with concrete detail, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint (e.g., verifying the chosen number is unused or re-checking the registration row). The mistakes table lists pitfalls but is not a validate-fix-retry loop, matching the 'minor validation gaps' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a single-file skill with no bundle files, everything (template, trigger examples, mistakes table) is appropriately inline and well-sectioned with clear headers. It sits at ~100 lines with no external references to signal, so the under-50-line exception for a top score does not strictly apply; structure is good with no organization issues. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |