Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow. It is held back by inlined reference material Claude largely already knows and by references to bundle scripts that are not actually present.
Suggestions
Move the 'OpenSCAD Quick Reference' and 'Camera Positions' sections into separate reference files (e.g. references/quick-reference.md) and link to them from the body to reduce token cost.
Trim the repeated visual-validation mandate to a single authoritative checkpoint, and remove explanations of basic OpenSCAD primitives Claude already knows.
Either include the referenced ./tools/*.sh scripts in the bundle (scripts/ or tools/) or reframe the commands so they do not imply missing files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with code and command examples, but the 'OpenSCAD Quick Reference' section explains basic language primitives Claude already knows and the visual-validation mandate is restated multiple times. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout — concrete shell commands with flags, a real OpenSCAD code example, camera-position strings, and a complete end-to-end worked example covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered workflow (create, validate, preview, view, iterate, export) with an explicit visual-validation checkpoint and a feedback loop instructing re-validation when output looks wrong. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear headers, but all content is inlined into one file — the Quick Reference and Camera Positions are bulk material that could be split out — and none of the referenced ./tools/*.sh scripts are present in the bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |