Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and clean organization; the only drag is a hardcoded version number in the example checklist. Replacing the literal version with a placeholder would push conciseness to 3.
Suggestions
Replace the hardcoded "v1.0.39" in the example checklist with a placeholder like "v<VERSION>" so the example does not carry time-sensitive data.
Optionally trim the checklist template to only the rows that vary per run, leaving the rest to be filled from actual results.
Keep the executable fallback and explicit restart step — they are the strongest parts of the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the example checklist hardcodes a time-sensitive version number ("Built and installed v1.0.39") outside a deprecated section, which the rubric penalizes; otherwise it would reach level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance — the MCP tool call, shell execution instruction, and a copy-paste fallback snippet with real paths (cli.bundle.mjs / build/cli.js) and a concrete `node "$CLI" upgrade` command. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with a verification checklist ("Doctor: all checks PASS", "[ ] for failure") and an explicit error-recovery fallback, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor; this is a simple skill where the single workflow is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent) and well-organized sections, qualifying for level 3 under the simple-skills scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |