Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced release workflow with validation checkpoints and error-recovery invariants throughout. The main improvement opportunities are moving the release-notes template and Homebrew scheduling detail into reference files and trimming a few explanatory passages.
Suggestions
Extract the step-5 release-notes editorial guidance and markdown template into a references file (e.g., references/release-notes.md), keeping only the worktree setup, video recording, and apply steps inline.
Move the Homebrew Autobump cron-inspection script and scheduling explanation in step 6 into a references file, keeping the formula-version gate and mise verification inline.
Tighten prose passages that restate the same constraint across steps (e.g., prerelease/backport channel rules appear in steps 1, 4, and 6) into a single channel-policy statement.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no git/npm/gh primers) and nearly every sentence adds project-specific operational detail, but at ~300 lines a few passages — the release-notes editorial guidance and the Autobump cron explanation — could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-with-minor-over-explanation anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready and guarded ("set -euo pipefail", "test -n \"$run_id\"", the porcelain cleanliness check, exact scripts and file paths), and the release-notes template covers the common case concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered stages each carry explicit validation ("bench:release:compare", "check:changelog", dist-tag and archive verification, "Stop if versions, channel, tag, archives, or attestations disagree"), and the "Failure invariants" section provides fix-regenerate-revalidate feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized and the two pointers ("benchmarks/release/README.md" for accepted regressions, "skills/hunk-launch-video/SKILL.md" for video capture) are well-signaled one-level references, but the inlined release-notes template and Homebrew Autobump scheduling computation are chunks that could live in separate files, leaving minor organization gaps short of the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |