Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable best-practices reference with concrete commands, code patterns, and validation checkpoints, plus good progressive disclosure through deferred rule-file references. The only real gap is the absence of an explicit end-to-end validate→fix→retry workflow loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, reference-style operational rules with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (gates, pitfalls, commands, file paths) earns its place, including the justified macOS filepath gotcha and worked incident example. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable guidance throughout: concrete commands (go test ./..., golangci-lint run, -race, -count=1), specific code patterns (t.TempDir(), filepath.Abs(), ToolSearch(query: "select:AskUserQuestion,..."), Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "opus", ...)), and exact file locations (internal/config/envkeys.go, defaults.go). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a multi-topic reference rather than a linear process, it still embeds validation checkpoints and feedback loops (TRUST 5 'Failure action' column, 'After fixing any test, run the FULL suite', the 5-section verification report format), but lacks a single explicit validate→fix→retry loop tying the gates together. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-signaled sections and deliberately defers detail to one-level-deep rule files (Cross-References list plus inline 'see .claude/rules/...' pointers), and avoids repeating the archived-agent names by pointing to the SSOT; minor gap is that no bundle files exist and several sections are fairly long inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |