Conciseness

The body is dense and factual — tables, a path map, and terse numbered steps — with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. It fits anchor 4 rather than 5 because of repeated facts: "//go:embed all:templates" appears three times (Architecture, Key Paths, Build Cycle) and the Template-First rule is stated twice in the same section.

Actionability

Mostly executable guidance with concrete commands: `make build`, `moai update`, `./moai init /tmp/test-project`, `go test ./internal/template/... -run TestTemplateNeutralityAudit`, and `/moai plan "<description>"`. Minor gaps remain, e.g. "sync-auditor 4-dimension gate" never states what the four dimensions are, and the delegation-map entries name agents without their prompts or paths.

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow is a clear numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (`go test` neutrality audit, "Verify the local .claude/ .moai/ reflects the template", plan-auditor audit gate, human approval gate), so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. It stops short of anchor 5 because no error-recovery feedback loops (if-fails-then-fix-and-retry) are spelled out.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist, and the single SKILL.md is well organized into clearly headed sections with a Cross-References section listing one-level-deep, clearly signaled project paths. Minor gaps: the frontmatter advertises level_3_optional with no optional reference files present, and dense inline material like the delegation map could live in a reference file.

Specificity

The description explicitly names six specific coverage areas ("CLI/template/config/hook/spec subsystem architecture, key source paths, the Pipeline specialist delegation map, the Template-First build cycle, the namespace separation contract") plus concrete add-a-template / add-a-hook / add-an-agent / add-a-SPEC workflows. It matches anchor 4 (several specific items, minor gaps) rather than 5 because it describes coverage of a reference rather than comprehensive concrete actions, and leaves scope edges unstated.

Completeness

Both what and when are explicitly stated: the "what" is the detailed coverage list, and the "when" is "Loaded by the specialists when working on moai-adk-go's own Go codebase and templates" — an explicit trigger clause (so the missing-'Use when' cap does not apply). Voice is third person ("Covers", "Loaded by"), matching the top anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage: "moai-adk-go", "Go codebase", "templates", the four specialist names, and "add-a-hook / add-a-SPEC" workflows. It falls short of anchor 5 because file extensions and additional synonyms (e.g. embed.go, make build, go:embed) appear only in the frontmatter triggers block, not in the description itself.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche with distinct triggers: scoped to "moai-adk-go domain-patterns reference for the 4 harness specialists (cli-template-specialist, quality-specialist, workflow-specialist, hook-ci-specialist)" — the named agents and product-specific terms make triggering for the wrong skill very unlikely.