Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable reference skill body with concrete commands, clear workflows, and explicit validation gates. The main improvement area is making failure-handling feedback loops explicit in the build/test workflows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense reference content with tables, paths, and commands that assumes Claude's competence and avoids basic-concept padding; the long SPEC step-7 parenthetical about the retired mx_commit_sha/§E.5 step could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Workflows give concrete, copy-paste-ready commands and paths (make build, moai update, go test ./internal/template/... -run TestTemplateNeutralityAudit, moai hook <event>, ./moai init /tmp/test-project) covering the common add-template/hook/agent/SPEC cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints (neutrality audit, plan-auditor gate, human approval gate, sync-auditor 4-dimension gate), but explicit fix-and-retry feedback loops on failure are not always stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a one-level-deep Cross-References block pointing to external rule/spec files; no bundle files exist to split further, and structure is good with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |