Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear six-principle overview, sequenced SPEC workflow, and verification checklists, but it is held back by redundant/explanatory prose, mostly conceptual rather than copy-paste-ready guidance, and 'Detailed Reference' links to module files that are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing modules/ bundle files referenced throughout (trust-5-framework.md, spec-first-ddd.md, delegation-patterns.md, token-optimization.md, progressive-disclosure.md, modular-system.md, agents-reference.md, commands-reference.md, execution-rules.md) or remove and correct the dead 'Detailed Reference: modules/...' links, since none of those paths exist in the bundle.
Consolidate the duplicated token-budget allocation (30K/180K/40K appears in both 'Token Optimization' and 'Token Budget (absorbed...)') into a single SSOT location and trim benefit-justification prose like 'eliminates style debates' and 'improves maintenance velocity.'
Replace high-level pillar descriptions with concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance such as actual GEARS requirement examples and sample Agent() delegation prompts, instead of deferring executable detail to the non-existent modules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body carries concrete content but pads it with benefit-justification prose ('eliminates style debates and merge conflicts and improves readability,' 'improves maintenance velocity') and repeats the 30K/180K/40K token allocation in both the Token Optimization section and the later 'Token Budget (absorbed...)' section, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It includes concrete commands ('go test -cover,' 'pytest --cov,' '/moai plan,' '/clear'), delegation syntax, and a resume-message code block, but much of the body is conceptual pillar/phase description and key executable detail (working GEARS examples, sample Agent() prompts) is deferred to module references that are not present. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three SPEC phases are clearly sequenced and backed by validation gates ('Validate with at least 85% coverage,' TRUST 5 block-merge) plus a verification checklist, but per-phase validate-fix-retry feedback loops are scattered and implicit rather than spelled out inline at each step. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview is well-organized with clearly signaled one-level-deep 'Detailed Reference: modules/X.md' links and the real references/examples.md and reference.md files, but the nine referenced modules/*.md paths do not exist in the bundle, so the disclosure promise is partly broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |