Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient and action-oriented with a clearly sequenced, validated workflow and a real feedback loop. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it signals a REFERENCE.md bundle file that does not exist, breaking navigation.
Suggestions
Add the missing REFERENCE.md under a references/ directory so the '[REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md)' link resolves, or remove the link if the inline reviewer prompt is sufficient.
Consider promoting the inline runSubagent snippet to a complete, copy-paste-ready reviewer prompt template so actionability reaches the top anchor.
Verify that referenced companion skills ('panel-majority-vote', 'team-lead-reference') are named consistently with their actual skill names to avoid dead links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — terse tables, compact bullets, and minimal code blocks assume Claude's competence with no padding or restatement of known concepts, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance (a runSubagent call, an `npx opencastle log` command, a structured verdict template), but the verdict block is a format spec rather than fully copy-paste-ready code, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step procedure (Collect Context, Spawn Reviewer, Parse Verdict, Handle Verdict) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation logic (PASS/FAIL thresholds) and a retry-then-escalate feedback loop for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the single external reference '[REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md)' points to a file that is not present in the bundle (no references/ directory exists), so navigation is incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |