Runs 3 isolated reviewer sub-agents; consolidates PASS/BLOCK verdict by majority. Use when user requests independent review of code changes, pull requests, design documents, or release notes.
67
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
In SKILL.md step 2, the reviewers are spawned via `runSubagent` with identical prompts that include the outsider-authored “question text” and an “artifact list” whose contents are under `<runRoot>`, and the reviewer outputs are then parsed verbatim for `VERDICT:`/fix items—so arbitrary free text submitted as the question can be ingested into the LLM without selecting a specific trusted item first.
fa0c341
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.