Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable procedural guide with concrete commands, real example-file references, and a verification section. It is efficient and clearly sequenced, with only minor gaps in feedback-loop explicitness and a few reference-based steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and well-organized with executable commands and key-element lists; only minor explanatory sentences (e.g. 'This configures Robolectric to use Android SDK 35') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (mkdir, mach gradle, mach lint) and real file paths, but build.gradle and Kotlin source steps reference external examples rather than giving copy-paste code, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 9-step process with a dedicated Verification section (buildDebug, testDebug, lint) as checkpoints, but lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections and clearly signaled one-level references to repo example files; no nested references. Slightly long for a single file, with build.gradle/source details that could live in reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |