context-engineering
Master context engineering for AI agent systems. Use when designing agent architectures, debugging context failures, optimizing token usage, implementing memory systems, building multi-agent coordination, evaluating agent performance, or developing LLM-powered pipelines. Covers context fundamentals, degradation patterns, optimization techniques (compaction, masking, caching), compression strategies, memory architectures, multi-agent patterns, LLM-as-Judge evaluation, tool design, and project development.
70
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Context Engineering
Context engineering curates the smallest high-signal token set for LLM tasks. The goal: maximize reasoning quality while minimizing token usage.
When to Activate
- Designing/debugging agent systems
- Context limits constrain performance
- Optimizing cost/latency
- Building multi-agent coordination
- Implementing memory systems
- Evaluating agent performance
- Developing LLM-powered pipelines
Core Principles
- Context quality > quantity - High-signal tokens beat exhaustive content
- Attention is finite - U-shaped curve favors beginning/end positions
- Progressive disclosure - Load information just-in-time
- Isolation prevents degradation - Partition work across sub-agents
- Measure before optimizing - Know your baseline
Quick Reference
| Topic | When to Use | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamentals | Understanding context anatomy, attention mechanics | context-fundamentals.md |
| Degradation | Debugging failures, lost-in-middle, poisoning | context-degradation.md |
| Optimization | Compaction, masking, caching, partitioning | context-optimization.md |
| Compression | Long sessions, summarization strategies | context-compression.md |
| Memory | Cross-session persistence, knowledge graphs | memory-systems.md |
| Multi-Agent | Coordination patterns, context isolation | multi-agent-patterns.md |
| Evaluation | Testing agents, LLM-as-Judge, metrics | evaluation.md |
| Tool Design | Tool consolidation, description engineering | tool-design.md |
| Pipelines | Project development, batch processing | project-development.md |
Key Metrics
- Token utilization: Warning at 70%, trigger optimization at 80%
- Token variance: Explains 80% of agent performance variance
- Multi-agent cost: ~15x single agent baseline
- Compaction target: 50-70% reduction, <5% quality loss
- Cache hit target: 70%+ for stable workloads
Four-Bucket Strategy
- Write: Save context externally (scratchpads, files)
- Select: Pull only relevant context (retrieval, filtering)
- Compress: Reduce tokens while preserving info (summarization)
- Isolate: Split across sub-agents (partitioning)
Anti-Patterns
- Exhaustive context over curated context
- Critical info in middle positions
- No compaction triggers before limits
- Single agent for parallelizable tasks
- Tools without clear descriptions
Guidelines
- Place critical info at beginning/end of context
- Implement compaction at 70-80% utilization
- Use sub-agents for context isolation, not role-play
- Design tools with 4-question framework (what, when, inputs, returns)
- Optimize for tokens-per-task, not tokens-per-request
- Validate with probe-based evaluation
- Monitor KV-cache hit rates in production
- Start minimal, add complexity only when proven necessary
Scripts
- context_analyzer.py - Context health analysis, degradation detection
- compression_evaluator.py - Compression quality evaluation
- Repository
- mrgoonie/claudekit-skills
- Commit
80113d8
- Last updated
- First committed
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.