fix-bug
Resolves a single bug from any starting evidence — Dash0 telemetry (span, log, web event, RUM error link), a stack trace, an error message, a code pointer (file:line), a screen recording, a Linear ticket URL, or a free-text symptom. Classifies the input, triages complexity (Phase 0.5) to pick a fast lane or a full holistic-analysis lane, runs a pre-flight sweep, locks a failing reproduction (delegating to /tdd, /e2e-testing, or /e2e-testing-mobile by layer), delegates root-cause analysis to the isolated rca-investigator agent on complex bugs, gates on confidence(analysis), and at >= 92 % hands off without human confirmation — fast lane via aw-create-plan + aw-executor, standard lane via aw-planner + aw-executor, both under a CEGIS refinement contract. A bug-fix-verifier agent grades the PR before undrafting; for telemetry-sourced bugs an optional Phase 8 polls the originating signal post-deploy. --analyse-only stops at the proposal; --force-holistic skips the fast lane. Triggers on "/fix-bug".
65
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow ingests outsider-authored free text via GitHub issues/PR reading referenced in the rules.
- Repository
- mthines/agent-skills
- Commit
39b3f44
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.