Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly sequenced, with complete operation specs for every step. Weaknesses are systematic boilerplate repetition across steps and the absence of a verification checkpoint before the destructive delete operation.
Suggestions
Factor the repeated targetOrganizationId/portalId input descriptions into a single stated convention (e.g., "all operations take the shared targetOrganizationId and portalId inputs described in Prerequisites") and drop them from each block.
Add a pre-deletion validation step to Step 7, such as calling getApplicationDetailById (and checking bound contracts) to confirm the application is unused before deleteApplication runs.
Trim the motivational framing sections ("What you'll build", "What You've Built") and fold the completion checklist into the step sequence to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The seven operation blocks each repeat identical boilerplate ("Anypoint organization ID hosting the portal" / "Portal ID" descriptions appear seven times verbatim), and motivational sections ("What you'll build", "What You've Built", the checkmark line) add tokens without operational value — systematic tightening opportunities, matching anchor 3 rather than 4's "minor instances". | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step supplies a complete, executable YAML operation block with api, operationId, inputs with descriptions and examples, and JSONPath outputs — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases (e.g., the applicationRequest example with redirectUris), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–7 are clearly sequenced with useful checkpoints (name-availability check before create, capture-the-secret warning, rotation invalidation note, completion checklist), but Step 7 is a destructive operation ("All contracts bound to it are revoked") with no pre-deletion verification — per the judging guidelines, a destructive workflow without validation is capped at 3 even though sequencing is otherwise strong. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well organized into a navigable step sequence with clearly signaled related-skill pointers ("request-api-access", "discover-portal-apis"); the repeated shared-input boilerplate is the only content arguably belonging in a shared reference, matching anchor 4's good structure with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |