Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow: every step is a complete executable tool-call specification with an explicit pre-contract validation checkpoint and a completion checklist. The main costs are repetition (duplicated "What you'll need" lists and restated input descriptions) and the absence of error-recovery branches for failure cases like mismatched grant types.
Suggestions
Remove the per-step "What you'll need" bullet lists — they duplicate the inputs already declared in each YAML block — and define shared context variables (targetOrganizationId, portalId, groupId, assetId, minorVersion, instanceId, applicationId) once in Prerequisites, referencing them from each step.
Add a short error-recovery branch after the Step 2/3 grant-type cross-check (e.g., "If no grant type overlaps, add one to the application via manage-portal-applications, then re-check") and guidance on what to do if a contract remains PENDING.
Move the seven per-operation YAML definitions into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g., references/operations.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview linking to it, trimming roughly two-thirds of the current body length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean domain-specific guidance, but each of the seven steps repeats a "What you'll need" list that duplicates the YAML inputs block immediately below it, and input descriptions like "Anypoint organization ID hosting the portal" are restated in every step. Fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient but could be tightened) rather than 4, where only minor trimming would be needed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step provides a complete, executable YAML tool-call definition with named operations, typed inputs, output JSON paths, and a concrete payload example for contractRequest. This is copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases, matching the anchor-5 example; not 4 because there are no pseudocode or missing-key-detail gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit pre-condition checkpoint ("Confirm at least one grant type overlaps between Step 2 and Step 3 before creating the contract"), a status-verification step (APPROVED vs PENDING), and a completion checklist. Falls short of anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop — e.g., what to do when no grant type matches or a contract stays PENDING beyond "see manage-portal-applications". | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure (Overview, Prerequisites, Steps 1–7, Checklist, Next Steps, Related Jobs) with cross-links to sibling skills clearly signaled at point of use. Not 5: at ~310 lines, the seven per-operation YAML definitions are candidates for a one-level-deep reference file, leaving SKILL.md as a leaner overview — the minor organization gap of anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |