Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, highly actionable conversion skill: field-by-field mapping tables, executable templates, and a validated workflow cover the task comprehensively. The main weaknesses are minor redundancy (duplicated ID-format caveats, Common-mistakes restatements) and the absence of a post-write verification step.
Suggestions
Consolidate the twice-stated 'connection/broker IDs are not format-restricted by the V2 schema' caveat into a single note in Step 3a, since the connections and brokers paragraphs repeat the same convention-vs-lint-rule explanation almost verbatim.
Add a post-write verification step (e.g., re-check that each trigger's target 'brokers://<broker-id>/a2a' matches the YAML broker key exactly and that the output mirrors references/v2-example.md structurally) to close the workflow's missing output-validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with domain-specific V1→V2 mapping rules Claude cannot know, with no generic-concept padding. However, the 'IDs are not format-restricted by the V2 schema' caveat is explained at near-identical length twice (connections and broker IDs), and the 'Common mistakes' section largely restates rules already stated in Steps 3a–3c. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a copy-paste-ready V2 broker YAML skeleton, an exact before/after connection translation example, a field-by-field V1→V2 mapping table, concrete tool directives (mkdir -p, Write, AskUserQuestion), and a placeholder template (references/v2-template.agent) to fill for the .agent file. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit input-validation gate in Step 1 (including a quoted stop-and-ask failure message) and overwrite guards in Steps 2 and 4. The gap is post-write: 'After writing, list the created files' is a listing, not verification of the output, so no feedback loop closes the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three real, one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled with its purpose and the workflow step where it applies; the heavy canonical examples (v1-example.md, v2-example.md) and the full .agent template are appropriately offloaded from SKILL.md, and body sections are well organized. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |