review-pr
Use when reviewing a pull request - security-focused review following repo agent guidance for breaking changes, malicious patterns, and backward compatibility
61
72%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
In “Review Pull Request”, the required runtime workflow fetches outsider-authored PR content from GitHub (PR details/diffs/files) via `gh pr view` and `gh pr diff`, then the LLM performs security/compatibility/quality analysis on that fetched diff text.
- Commit
bb1622c
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.